An Economic repudiation of Equity Diversity and Inclusion programs

In order to explain the gravity of failure that EDI/ DEI programs have had across the world we need to create a framework from which to analyze the damage. Since the fundamental argument for EDI/ DEI programs has to do with increasing innovation a pragmatic framework for innovation must be used. As the fundamental oxygen of human systems is money, only an economic framework can be used to analyze these programs.

As no popular framework currently exists, this analysis will postulate the creation of a new economic framework known as Innovation Economics. Since the author is extremely bias to pragmatic scientific fields, bio-mimicry will be used to postulate the framework as a best approximation of evolutionary systems.

For a complete linear transform of how evolution is the concept popularly known as Innovation please refer to the following in-depth transform:

https://chahal-amandeep.medium.com/transposition-of-evolution-into-innovation-2006122eb60d

Innovation Economics:

biomimicry influence: evolution. Original paper by Max Kleeber in an initial attempt to modify The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin to create evolving cities. While Kleebers work remains largely incomplete his initial paper formulates the first transposition from evolution to economics.

Definitions:

Economics: the branch of knowledge concerned with the production, consumption, and transfer of wealth.

Innovation: the use of critical thinking and imagination in solving problems. It is recognized that innovation can be productive or not productive. non productive innovation is often refereed to as art. productive innovation can be applied into formal human systems to solve problems. while most companies profess to be innovative, they do not quantify innovation monetarily thereby ensuring that the ambiguity around the definition of the term insures it is never measured.

Innovation Economics:

The discipline in which the use of critical thinking and imagination is used to create efficient use of resources in order to ensure the cohesive and healthy functioning of human well being through effective production, consumption and transfer of wealth.

EDI/ DEI: Popularly known as Equity, Diversity and Inclusion programs or Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs that are designed to hire people of color and women into jobs that are sponsored by executive management. To increase the mobility of people of color and women in the economy. Formerly known as quota reserved hiring in India for scheduled caste groups and affirmative action in the United States to increase the mobility of repressed black individuals who were held back from opportunities because of their skin color.

Primary thesis/ argument:

EDI/ DEI programs as they appear in popular hiring, the practice of hiring for race, gender or other demographic metrics fail to even consider that the individuals who are demographically different from the homogeneous environment that they are hired into could bring any independent economic worth on their own. they not only fail to consider that the cause for the initial asymmetry in hiring is due to subconscious bias they also position the hiring of meritocratic candidates as a form of charity.

This positions, yet again with more weight the existing power dynamics of white men at work. negating the fundamental problem that hiring people of diverse background does nothing other than make the executive sponsor look diverse without ever mobilizing their fundamental knowledge.

EDI/ DEI hires are then positioned as a form of human hired pet. that is used to diversity wash meetings that are designed to hold them back. they are further negotiated down from their “radical” views which are inherently academic and experiential in nature. the act of negotiating them down from their innovative ideas is a form of control exerted by the executive teams to make sure that diversity hires know that change is “incremental”.

the notion of incremental change borrows ideology from the idea of natural selection evolution. in all systems, nature only provides the building blocks of life. all life has free will. no innovation or evolution is incremental. it is a choice. a fundamental life propagating money making choice.

therefore the primary cause of the failure of EDI/ DEI programs is the choice of the executive sponsors. howsoever they look.

The majority of all boards holds steady at 25.8%, furthermore the practice of hiring one person who checks multiple boxes continues to hold. It is therefore assumed that without changing the environment within which the qualified person, who was being held back from opportunity due to the fundamental bias endemic in the economy, no mobilization of knowledge or improvement in innovation economics will take place. On the contrary, an enhanced barrier of disproportionate exclusion will begin to form attributed to the “othering” effect.

the only person who will be targeted in this scenario is the diversity hire.

two extremely simple modifications can remove the economic deadlock that we now find endemic across the world.

1. change the entire board. hire based on merit not based on demographic profiles.
2. accept that white male supremacy is an economic choice and restore it formally in the economy.

there are only two ways environments are formed cohesively. a choice must be made in every company.

1. accept engineered colonization as an economic choice and accept the corresponding inefficiencies.
2. grow organic merit based evolutionary systems that can create future growth and life.

It should be noted that both choices will lead to the same end. by accepting white male supremacy now, white men who are meritocratically hired will make decisions that are in the health of the environment naturally. removing their trigger of non white men will serve to make them more productive. eventually white male supremacy will choose to end on its own in favor of the collective. it will be uneconomical to have one group of person make all the decisions.

Cause:

Disclaimer: no proxy for the cause exists in any other scientific field. therefore biomimicry cannot be used to postulate a scientific analysis that is consistent in any other systems. as the cause is human in nature, only psychology can be used. the author is not a trained psychologist therefore will borrow from the disciplines of gender studies and personal experience that verifies the analysis.

The initial analysis was done at Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada to provide Kristy Duncan a detailed study on how to increase the number of women in STEM fields. The original paper cannot be released as it was done for the Government of Canada and the analysis belongs to them.

The colonized Definition of Masculinity:

Masculinity in colonized countries is not a function of the biological role that men serve in a healthy human collective. rather it is a function of their role as economic units at the expense of all natural biological needs.

the primary cause for the definition of masculinity being asymmetrical in colonized countries appears to be the manner of application of the misunderstood teachings of Christianity. the original settlers of these lands were faithful to a form of Christianity that is no longer relevant today.

All diasporas stay extra loyal to the memory of the place they come from. these memories serve to effectively create a form of “time warping” that is cultural in nature. isolating those diasporas into a form of outdated loyalty to a definition of identity that no longer holds relevant.

examples of such conditions:

1. French people do not consider quebecquois to be french. they do not even understand the language properly as it is a form of what they call “old village french”.
2. The British people do not consider Canadians to be British even if they have lineage to britian.

A similar form of divergence is seen in nature where species are separated by natural barriers. these species begin to form their own unique identities. while they are branches of the same root, their localized habits can often have biological divergence in them.

Colonization as an economic policy:

Disclaimer: While this analysis can be studied from historical record, and it will formulate to the exact clinical chronology highlighted below, the author would suggest a much more civilized way of understanding how this time period evolved. The works of Jane Austen and the Bronte sisters allude to the experiences of the women in these societies. The novels were popular among men and women even though they were written under male pseudonyms. A practice that continues on today and has also given those of us who enjoy the written word the extreme luxury of Harry Potter. A must read during Christmas time.

It should be noted that colonization was an economic policy of the time. the kings only made money from taxes. as they provided no function to the farmers and peasants and no means was available for these individuals to earn money the tax base for the initial royalty began to become poorer. as we see with Canada today.

this created an awkward problem as the ruling class grew in numbers. the ruling class was given a form of occupation in the kings court through titles that came with property and slaves. however only the oldest born son could inherit the title and subsequent money. women had to marry rich first born sons or become governesses.

the key challenge was the second and all subsequent sons of the kings court needed an occupation. this occupation became the priesthood. the priesthood came with the charitable notion that by educating the slaves the priest was making sure their souls would be saved. since slaves were not understood to be biologically human at the time.

however the kings tax base continued to dwindle. with modern technology life spans grew and money was needed. this is how the British gained the most impressive navy in the known world. the Navy was used to steal from the colonies to bring wealth back for the king. in exchange the officers of the navy would then be considered an acceptable form of second class citizen.

A note on the role of women:

It is a time honored tradition of human civilization to not value the work that gives humanity life. womens work has never been valued for the simple reason that women are not valued. however an honest study of history reveals that women enjoyed significant membership in all forms of occupations.

women worked as scientists, as apothecaries, as artists and as authors. since women were never going to be valued they worked for the pleasure of their work.

the erasing of the delicate hemlines of women across historical knowledge does not infact erase their humming song that has brought us so casually into the 2024 time period.

that female apothecaries become witches and were burned, that they became governesses for art because they could not earn, that they married Einstein because they could not publish does not change the fact that they loved their craft so much they wanted to eat radioactive waste to prove that radioactivity was lethal.

the knowledge of the womens names does not have any bearing on the merit of their work. NASA only landed on the moon because of the program written by a woman who was then left by her entire team to explain why it performed so well that despite the fact that the shuttle warning system told the lander to abort, her code prioritized the work sequence in such a way that Mr. Armstrong would step out for a stroll.

All done with exceptional ease to maximize the computational power of the onboard computer. that had less computational ability than a Timex watch in its time. when there are fewer resources to exploit, the resources available are valued appropriately.

The evolution of the definition of colonized masculinity:

The definition of masculinity in colonized worlds where white men continue to hold power is a similar eccentricity of un-analyzed self identity.

the only way to ensure more diverse ideas are mobilized in work places to increase maximum productivity to ensure that all sectors of the economy are operating at their biologically assumed peak productivity is to effectively redefine masculinity.

Key Factors in the definition of Masculinity that are materially resulting ins the failure of all economic policies that lead to production:

1. A binary emotional existence that confines men to only express rage, or indicate a desire to mate.
2. a devaluation of male identity when it overlaps with what is considered to be “female” traits.*

*It is unknown why the initial expressions of Christianity devalued all aspects of female identity. The initial versions of Christianity deport closer to indicating that the initial “Church” was actually recruiting and building slave armies. Their practices deport on the same lines that militia in Africa use to create child solders.

These practices target both men and women when they are young. Girls are trained to be both solders and sex slaves. Boys are effectively spiritually “neutered” by being forced to commit a crime on their family or watch as their women are assaulted in front of them.

Girls are not given a reward other than, if they are lucky, not being violently raped. For which they must express gratitude.

Boys are rewarded by being allowed to rape women if they do what the army generals what them to do.

Effects of colonization on male identity:

contrary to popular knowledge 3 groups of individuals actually were used to colonize most countries. these include:

1. the elite groups of individuals who were connected to the kings courts back home and served to be the effective representative of both the kings law and the Church.
2. white men who were brought as indentured slaves to work.
3. white women who were brought as indentured slaves to work.

Author’s personal note:

this analysis does not serve to express a personal opinion. throughout human civilization practices like female foeticide have emerged as being commonplace. in addition slavery based on color and gender is endemic in human civilization.

therefore it stands to reason that if human civilization has not achieved the maturation needed for the implementation of true economic principals then it would be better to restore the next best healthy alternative.

countries that are modeled with the acceptance of male supremacy do function in two effective societies. it is in the best interest of the most number of people to expect this form of organization to begin a productive economic life cycle.

the best known example of such a society remains, Saudi Arabia.